* Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> [150105 12:23]:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 02:10:14PM -0600, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> > >> +static int wkup_m3_rpm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > >> +{
> > >> + return -EBUSY;
> > >> +}
> > >
> > > looks like this is just coping with omap_device bogosity, no ?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, without this omap_device shuts down ther wkup_m3 during suspend, which of
> > course prevents the wkup_m3 from finishing suspend process or waking SoC back
> > up. Haven't found a better solution for the problem than this.
>
> Tony, any better for this ? Do we keep this small hack or find a better
> way ?
Looks OK to me for now, later on we may want to have a flag for
HWMOD_NEVER_IDLE or something similar for wkup_m3_hwmod. But let's
not add more dependencies to this series.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
