On 17 December 2014 at 20:58, Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote: > I still do not see the need to crash the entire system - OK, fine > cpufreq is broke, but the remaining part of the system can easily > function. That BUG does look like a ugly point and lack of proper > cleanup logic - cpufreq should be expected to report and gracefully > shut itself down, not screw up my platform boot. http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-kernel/2013-November/009128.html We came to this conclusion because you insisted that its not safe for the system to continue on a unsupported frequency from kernel's freq table. It may run well, but we don't know what will happen in longer run.. And surely it deserves a bug-on then. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
