On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:54:40AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > There is a patch named "ARM: edma: unconditionally ack the error > interrupt". I have the feeling that this is not really required once we > delay set_termios. I couldn't reproduce the bug with beagleblack with my > usual test case. I think so too. I didn't need it either. > For your "too much work for irq" problem: Could you add trace_printk() > in tx/rx dma start/complete, and irq routine? The interresting part is > what is the irq routine doing once entered. It might be a condition that > is ignored at first and "acked" later while serving another event. Or it > is really doing something and this is more or less "legal". I'll have a look at that. > > >Thanks, > >Frans > > Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
