On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Jyri Sarha wrote: > On 08/19/2014 02:32 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:46:39PM +0100, Jyri Sarha wrote: > >> The added ti,gpio-clock is a basic clock that can be enabled and > >> disabled trough a gpio output. The DT binding document for the clock > >> is also added. For EPROBE_DEFER handling the registering of the clock > >> has to be delayed until of_clk_get() call time. > > > > I guess this is basically an AND gate with the GPIO and parent clock as > > inputs? Or is this something more complex that we might want to do more > > things with later? > > > > If it's the former it sounds like this could be a completely generic > > "gpio-gate-clock". > > > > Yes, its completely generic. However, since there has been no response > to my several earlier attempts to get this patch in I finally gave up > and moved it under clk/ti. Ah. Apolgoies for that having happened. > "gpio-gate-clock" sound like more accurate name for ti. I'll change that. > > Do you think I should give this one more try to get it in as generic > basic clock? I'd certainly be happy with a generic gpio-gate-clock. Mike, thoughts? Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
