On 08/01/2014 11:22 AM, Pekon Gupta wrote: > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> * Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> [140801 00:49]: >>> On 08/01/2014 09:38 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>>> * Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> [140731 04:46]: >>>>> +Sourav for QSPI and Balaji for mmc >>>>> >>>>> On 07/30/2014 10:40 PM, Pekon Gupta wrote: >>>>>> Hi Roger, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> On 07/23/2014 01:58 PM, Pekon Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>> This patch adds support for parallel NOR device (S29GL512S10) present on J6-EVM. >>>>>>>> The Flash device is connected to GPMC controller on chip-select[0] and accessed >>>>>>>> as memory-mapped device. It has data-witdh=x16, capacity-64MBytes(512Mbits) and >>>>>>>> is CFI compatible. >>>>>>>> As multiple devices are share GPMC pins on this board, so following board >>>>>>>> settings are required to detect NOR device: >>>>>>>> SW5.1 (NAND_BOOTn) = OFF (logic-1) >>>>>>>> SW5.2 (NOR_BOOTn) = ON (logic-0) /* Active-low */ >>>>>>>> SW5.3 (eMMC_BOOTn) = OFF (logic-1) >>>>>>>> SW5.4 (QSPI_BOOTn) = OFF (logic-1) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why does NOR have any dependency on states of eMMC_BOOTn and QSPI_BOOTn? >>>>>>> >>>>>> If you see the schematics of J6-EVM, GPMC data and control lines are shared >>>>>> between NAND, NOR, eMMC (and probably QSPI also). >>>>>> I don't have access to TI's hardaware or board schematics anymore, so >>>>>> please double check. >>>>> >>>>> I just took a deeper look in the schematics. >>>>> It has nothing to do with GPMC Data and control lines but with the address lines. >>>>> The GPMC address lines are muxed on the same pins of the SoC as QSPI and MMC2. >>>>> i.e. A13-A18,CS2 for QSPI and A19-A27,CS1 for MMC2 >>>>> >>>>> NAND can probably work simultaneously with QSPI and MMC2 but for NOR case, QSPI and MMC2 >>>>> need to be disabled. >>>>> >>>>> This is starting to look ugly where apart from changing the DIP switch the DTS has to be >>>>> hand modified to support a certain case. >>>>> >>>>> Lets leave the most usable configuration for default case i.e. NAND, QSPI and MMC2 enabled and keep NOR information in the dts but keep it disabled with a note that if NOR is enabled then NAND, QSPI, and MMC2 nodes need to be disabled. >>>>> >>>>> I will resend this patch with the relevant changes. >>>> >>>> It might make sense for the gpmc driver to manage the pins in some >>>> cases. That would allow dynamic muxing of the pins depending which >>>> driver is loaded, or even during runtime if needed. >>> >>> It is more like a board configuration so something more generic than the gpmc driver has to manage. >>> Also, QSPI and MMC don't fall under GPMC scope. >>> >>> There are 2 things that need to change to update the hardware configuration. >>> 1) The pinmux via the enabling/disabling (or plugging in/out) of relevant nodes in the DT. >>> 2) The I2C GPIOs which reconfigure the DIP Switch lines in order to reconfigure external Muxes. >> >> Oh OK, yeah gpmc should only manage gpmc pins, this would need >> a separate driver for coordinating things. >> > You need to also consider the case where multiple devices of different types > are connected to different chip-selects like; > - NAND on chip-select[0] > - NOR on chip-select[1] NOR and NAND are both on CS0 because GMPC boot only happens on CS0. So they cannot be used simultaneously on DRA7-EVM. > And with acceptance of 'Rostislav Lisovy''s patch [1] this > multi-device configuration > is possible on custom boards. Yep, as song as the devices are on different CS. > > It would have been appropriate if pinctrl-probe was called from protocol drivers > (OMAP-NAND and NOR in this case). But I don't know if that's feasible even. > Also how drivers would handle probe conflicts arising with common pins. > Example: gpmc_ad[7:0] will be common to pin-mux of both NAND and NOR devices. GPMC devices always share Address, data and control lines. The Chip select line defines which chip is selected for GPMC access at any given moment. So there should be no conflict for multiple GPMC devices. And the pinmux conflict issue doesn't arise for them. > > Does pinctrl framework gives freedom to _ignore_ conflicts on already configured > pins, and continues with configuring remaining non-conflicting pins ? I'm not sure. I think it just overrides the configuration if a new device uses the same pin configured by an earlier device. > If yes, then > moving pinctrl-probe to OMAP-NAND | NOR protocol driver should be more > appropriate. I don't think this is applicable now. cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
