Hi,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:40:57AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:20:52AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> [140729 07:18]:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 05:14:25AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > * Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> [140728 14:19]:
> > > > > now that we don't need to support legacy board-files,
> > > > > we can completely switch over to a linear irq domain
> > > > > and make use of irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips() to
> > > > > allocate all generic irq chips for us.
> > > >
> > > > This patch seems to somehow break off-idle for omap3
> > > > where it no longer wakes up.
> > >
> > > Sure your bisection is correct ? This patch just switches from legacy
> > > irq domain to linear irq domain.
> >
> > Yes, I tried it a few times. Just enabling
> > retention idle hangs too with this patch.
> >
> > Maybe it's omap3_prcm_irq_setup that relies on
> > 11 + OMAP_INTC_START? There may be other such issues
>
> lol.
>
> OMAP4 has the same nonsense.
made me think why (if) OMAP4 works with that same setup. Does wake from
OFF work with OMAP4 ?
Anyway, here's a quick little hack to check if that's the reason for the
regression:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
index ff953c9..c234b98 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
prm: prm@48306000 {
compatible = "ti,omap3-prm";
reg = <0x48306000 0x4000>;
+ interrupts = <11>;
prm_clocks: clocks {
#address-cells = <1>;
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
index 25e8b82..3d11377 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c
@@ -242,6 +242,11 @@ void omap_prcm_irq_complete(void)
prcm_irq_setup->restore_irqen(prcm_irq_setup->saved_mask);
}
+static struct of_device_id tmp[] = {
+ { .compatible = "ti,omap3-prm" },
+ { }
+};
+
/**
* omap_prcm_register_chain_handler - initializes the prcm chained interrupt
* handler based on provided parameters
@@ -254,17 +259,24 @@ void omap_prcm_irq_complete(void)
*/
int omap_prcm_register_chain_handler(struct omap_prcm_irq_setup *irq_setup)
{
+ struct device_node *node;
int nr_regs;
u32 mask[OMAP_PRCM_MAX_NR_PENDING_REG];
int offset, i;
+ int irq;
struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
struct irq_chip_type *ct;
if (!irq_setup)
return -EINVAL;
+ irq = irq_setup->irq;
nr_regs = irq_setup->nr_regs;
+ node = of_find_matching_node(NULL, tmp);
+ if (node)
+ irq = of_irq_get(node, 0);
+
if (prcm_irq_setup) {
pr_err("PRCM: already initialized; won't reinitialize\n");
return -EINVAL;
@@ -298,7 +310,7 @@ int omap_prcm_register_chain_handler(struct omap_prcm_irq_setup *irq_setup)
1 << (offset & 0x1f);
}
- irq_set_chained_handler(irq_setup->irq, omap_prcm_irq_handler);
+ irq_set_chained_handler(irq, omap_prcm_irq_handler);
irq_setup->base_irq = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, irq_setup->nr_regs * 32,
0);
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
