ml->node and sl->node are currently initialized by means of INIT_LIST_HEAD(). That initialiation is followed by a list_add() call. Looking at what both these functions do we will have: ml->node.next = &ml->node; ml->node.prev = &ml->node; oi->master->master_ports.next.prev = &ml->node; ml->node.next = &oi->master->master_ports.next; ml->node.prev = &oi->master->master_ports; oi->master->master_ports.next = &ml->node; from this, it's clear that both INIT_LIST_HEAD() calls are unnecessary and can be safely removed. Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> --- found by code inspection, boot tested on am437x SK on today's linux-next + pending patches. arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c index 6c074f3..8194990 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c @@ -2828,12 +2828,10 @@ static int __init _add_link(struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if *oi) _alloc_links(&ml, &sl); ml->ocp_if = oi; - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ml->node); list_add(&ml->node, &oi->master->master_ports); oi->master->masters_cnt++; sl->ocp_if = oi; - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sl->node); list_add(&sl->node, &oi->slave->slave_ports); oi->slave->slaves_cnt++; -- 2.0.1.563.g66f467c -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
