Hi Pekon, On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:01:03AM +0000, Gupta, Pekon wrote: > >http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-June/266966.html > > > I don't think we need above patch. > Helper macro "for_each_available_child_of_node" internally takes care > of skipping nodes with status="disabled". > > $KERNEL/include/linux/of.h > #define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \ > for (child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \ > child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, child)) > > $KERNEL/drivers/of/base.c @@ of_get_next_available_child(...) { > ... > if (!__of_device_is_available(next)) > continue; > ... Yes, that's why I suggest using that macro. It's not currently used in gpmc.c and my patch changes the 'for_each_child_of_node' to a 'for_each_available_child_of_node'. Or am I missing something? Regards, -- Guido Martínez, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
