On Monday 16 June 2014 07:34 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > Sricharan, > > On Monday 16 June 2014 07:23 AM, Sricharan R wrote: >> This series does some cleanups, fixes for handling two interrupts >> getting mapped twice to same crossbar and provides support for >> hardwired IRQ and crossbar definitions. >> >> On certain platforms such as DRA7, SPIs 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, >> 131, 132, 133 are direct wired to hardware blocks bypassing >> crossbar. This quirky implementation is *NOT* supposed to be the >> expectation of crossbar hardware usage. This series adds support >> to represent such hard-wired irqs through DT and avoid generic >> allocation/programming of crossbar in the driver. >> >> This way of supporting hard-wired irqs was a result of >> the below discussions. >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg329946.html >> >> Based on 3.15 mainline. >> >> All the patches are available here >> git@xxxxxxxxxx:Sricharanti/sricharan.git crossbar_updates >> >> The fixes series[1] earlier posted is merged in to this. >> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg328273.html >> >> [V2] Merged the above series and rebased on 3.15 mainline >> >> [V3] Modified patch#3 to get irqs-skip properties from DT, >> merged path#8 for checkpatch warning to other relevant >> patches and fixed comments for other patches. >> > I scanned entire series again including your updates on Jason's > comments. All look good to my eyes. > > Hopefully after this series now, we can actually enable the crossbar > support on those machines. > > FWIW, > Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> Thanks Santosh. Regards, Sricharan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
