> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h > index 060a75e..ddaebcd 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h > @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ struct machine_desc { > enum reboot_mode reboot_mode; /* default restart mode */ > unsigned l2c_aux_val; /* L2 cache aux value */ > unsigned l2c_aux_mask; /* L2 cache aux mask */ > - void (*l2c_write_sec)(unsigned long, unsigned); > + void (*l2c_write_sec)(void __iomem *, > + unsigned long, unsigned); > struct smp_operations *smp; /* SMP operations */ > bool (*smp_init)(void); > void (*fixup)(struct tag *, char **); > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > index efc5cab..1695eab 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void l2c_write_sec(unsigned long val, void __iomem *base, unsigned reg) > if (val == readl_relaxed(base + reg)) > return; > if (outer_cache.write_sec) > - outer_cache.write_sec(val, reg); > + outer_cache.write_sec(base, val, reg); > else > writel_relaxed(val, base + reg); > } The parameter order (base, val, reg) seems very non-intuitive. Are you matching some existing prototype or adhering to some backwards compatibility issue? If not wouldn't, say, (base, reg, val) or (val, base, reg) be more intuitive? Thanks, jdl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html