On Mon 02 Jun 2014 11:03:24 AM CDT, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: [...] >>> 0,1 and 2. I've already send a patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/1/49 >>> that will allow me to fix that from board .dts, but I was wondering if >>> it is the correct way, or ids should be changed in omap3.dtsi for all >>> omap devices. >> >> Should'nt we retain 0,1,2 as indexing to make this consistent for all >> SoCs? >> >> > > I think this is the most sane thing, esp if the "alias replace" patch > gets accepted(thus allowing us to workaround the problems on N900 and > N9/50), however I wanted to hear from you on the matter. Esp that > indexing is different with legacy boot compared to DT boot. I think that slipped my check list unfortunately. :( But then, if we think that it is just n900 that is impacted, then I wonder if we can override the alias? just wondering.. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
