Re: regressions in linux-next?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Linus, what do you think of the following patch?
>
> From ede333e85e0320d32e8c2d123560808ed7e43ece Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:13:54 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: don't call irq_set_irq_type() on IRQ domain map
>  function
(...)

So no setting a default type in the mapping function...

> - irq_set_irq_type(irq, chip->irq_default_type);

But there are drivers exploiting this to set up the hardware to some
default state :-(

What about this:

if (chip->irq_default_type != IRQ_TYPE_NONE)
    irq_set_irq_type(irq, chip->irq_default_type);

This way you can pass IRQ_TYPE_NONE and nothing happens in
the mapping.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux