On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:01:26PM +0800, stanley.miao wrote: > Woodruff, Richard wrote: > >>>Here should be 0x100. Fixing this won't cause problems with smsc911x > >>>patches. > >>> > >>Yes it will - if it gets fixed in the -rc series for the smc911x driver > >>your patches will conflict. > >> > >>There's more which needs fixing though - no platform data is being passed > >>so the smc911x driver still fails to initialise. > >> > > > >Data sheet shows addressable range as 0x50 from base --> 0xFC. So 0xFF > >should be good. > > > >I tried to send Russell data sheet but his emails is rejecting it. > > > >Regards, > >Richard W. > > > > > It has been fixed. No, it has not been fixed - it continues to fail in mainline kernels. > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=123307584619895&w=2 That is a proposed patch for switching to the SMSC driver instead of the SMC driver. It's unclear at the moment whether it's acceptable to switch to the SMSC driver for the -rc kernels. Certainly just applying the patch above results in something which is also nonfunctional. The motivation here is to _fix_ mainline kernels. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
