On 02/27/2014 02:30 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> Currently, the TWL4030 PMIC does not completely poweroff the processor.
> Commit b0fc1da4d0359d3cce8f12e0f014aed0704ae202 introduced the necessary
> binding to do this, so use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo.dtsi | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo.dtsi
> index aea64c0..018e1e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo.dtsi
> @@ -73,6 +73,11 @@
> codec {
> };
> };
> +
> + twl_power: power {
> + compatible = "ti,twl4030-power";
> + ti,use_poweroff;
> + };
> };
> };
>
>
Urrgh.. this slipped past.. :(
ti,system-power-controller is traditionally used for other PMICs from
TI to indicate that poweroff functionality will be provided by the
PMIC driver. similar approach is taken by Maxim as well.. I know the
commit introducing the binding has been around for long, but
considering that we do not have a single dts using this yet, should we
consider adding "ti,system-power-controller"(as against removing
ti,use_poweroff - so that older down stream dtbs still work) and using
it in the new code?
just proposing here.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
