On 02/24/2014 09:51 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:50:00PM +0000, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
[...]
>> +static int omap_ssi_port_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct hsi_port *port = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + struct omap_ssi_port *omap_port = hsi_port_drvdata(port);
>> + struct hsi_controller *ssi = to_hsi_controller(port->device.parent);
>> + struct omap_ssi_controller *omap_ssi = hsi_controller_drvdata(ssi);
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "port runtime suspend!\n");
>> +
>> + ssi_set_port_mode(omap_port, SSI_MODE_SLEEP);
>> + if (omap_ssi->get_loss)
>> + omap_port->loss_count =
>> + (*omap_ssi->get_loss)(ssi->device.parent);
>
> You don't need to do (*struct->func)(args) when invoking a function
> pointer. You can jsut have struct->func(args) as we do elsewhere. This
> can be:
>
> omap_ssi->get_loss(ssi->device.parent)
>
> This should be fixed up in the other sites too.
in fact, we should stop expecting that service and drivers should
manage their own context_loss detection
Examples:
MMC:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0a82e06e6183a252608df48cc4793b83e2d73dfd
DSS: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=139272358619064&w=2
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
