Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: DTS: OMAP4: Add gpmc_fck clock node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/17/2014 06:13 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
Hi,

On 02/17/2014 01:29 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 02/17/2014 01:27 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
Add the gpmc_fck clock, derived from l3_ick, and reference it from
the GPMC node to get it correctly working.

Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@xxxxxxx>
---
   arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi           | 2 ++
   arch/arm/boot/dts/omap44xx-clocks.dtsi | 6 ++++++
   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
index d3f8a6e..8a0cc71 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
@@ -275,6 +275,8 @@
               gpmc,num-waitpins = <4>;
               ti,hwmods = "gpmc";
               ti,no-idle-on-init;
+            clocks = <&gpmc_fck>;
+            clock-names = "fck";
           };

           uart1: serial@4806a000 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap44xx-clocks.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap44xx-clocks.dtsi
index c821ff5..ae2c441 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap44xx-clocks.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap44xx-clocks.dtsi
@@ -1036,6 +1036,12 @@
           ti,index-power-of-two;
       };

+    gpmc_fck: gpmc_fck {
+        #clock-cells = <0>;
+        compatible = "ti,clkdm-gate-clock";
+        clocks = <&l3_div_ck>;
+    };
+

Why not implement a proper gate clock for CM_L3_2_GPMC_CLKCTRL? The
approach you have taken looks good to me otherwise.


So something like:

         gpmc_fck: gpmc_fck {
                 #clock-cells = <0>;
                 compatible = "ti,gate-clock";
                 clocks = <&l3_div_ck>;
                 reg = <(CM_L3_2_GPMC_CLKCTRL)>;
                 ti,bit-shift = <0>;
         };

? I was not sure for gate-clock, as setting the bit will enable the
clock only if the corresponding clock domain (CD_L3_2) is enabled as well.

Actually you may want not to add a gate clock for this, as this would result in duplicate control to the same bits... hwmod is already controlling this. Do you need the clkdm control for something? If not, you could just link the gpmc node directly to use l3_div_ck as the provider for its clock rate. Looking at the driver, I think you don't need it for anything else.

-Tero
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux