Hi Igor, On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 14:33 +0200, Igor Grinberg wrote: > On 02/16/14 19:26, Paul Bolle wrote: > > The Kconfig symbol MACH_CM_T3730 was added in v3.1. It has never been > > used. Setting it has no effect. There are no calls for > > machine_is_cm_t3730(). This symbol can safely be removed. > > Indeed... Please note that I now doubt my reasoning was correct here. I'm going to revisit my recent batch of patches regarding, in short, arm Kconfig symbols used in mach-types.h. (lkml.org is sort of down, so I can't provide a link.) > Is it such a burden to keep it just until we switch OMAP3 to DT? > Because, it makes a bit harder to hack on the kernel. > Well, not too much as it can be reverted, but still one needs > to remember to do this... No, not really. The worst that could happen, from your perspective, is that if it turns out this was the right thing to do, I might send a reminder in a few months. > I'd like to keep it just until we remove the board files, please. Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
