* Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> [140205 06:15]: > On Wed 05 Feb 2014 08:10:34 AM CST, Balaji T K wrote: > >>> > >>> Rather than ti,errata.. specific property, something like > >>> caps no/disable multiblock read is more readable in my opinion, Otherwise > >> > >> Is'nt the better definition to state i have quirk X and allow the > >> driver to do the necessary thing/things needed to handle quirk X? in > >> this case, there is just one thing to do: broken multi_block_read, in > >> the case of other quirks, there might be more than 1 thing to do.. let > >> driver figure that out, dts just states the h/w capabilty or in this > >> case, the quirk capability. > >> > > > > But in this case there is only one. disable multi block read is more readable > > than the errata reference, No strong feelings though. > > Considering this might set an precedence for other quirk description, > I'd like to leave it as it stands. Hmm if this really depends on the hardware version, how about just add new compatible flag ti,omap3430-rev-xyz-hsmmc that allows the driver to deal with the errata? Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
