On 29.01.2014 13:30, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 2014-01-28 20:17, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
On 28.01.2014 10:48, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
I made a somewhat hacky quickfix for beagle. Applying that and the
clk-divider from the link above makes things work for me. However, as I
said, the issue with n900 might be different, but it'd be interesting to
hear if it has any effect.
Tomi
Applying those 2 patches doesn't help, still get exactly the same warning.
Find attached my clk_summary (with my hacky patch applied, otherwise I
cannot boot the device)
Can you try this one:
From e511789f7be00beeeee0712910c60a57c51b2705 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:28:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] clkoutx2 fix
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c | 7 +++++++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
Yep, that one fixes the problem. Thanks!
Now I only need to find why maemo is 10 times slower with linux-next
compared to 3.13-rc7, but that is another story :).
Ivo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
