On 01/03/2014 09:48 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 01/03/14 01:13, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 12/22/2013 07:39 PM, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
Further I'd suggest to split this register access aspect out of
the TI clock series, and to prepare it already for regmap style
access to the hardware registers. See the next comment below.
This sounds like a good idea to me, seeing it is blocking lots of
other things.
This ll_ops struct looks like a simplified regmap. Have you seen my
series that adds regmap support to the common clock framework[1]? Is
there any reason why you can't use those patches and layer some patches
on top to add support for regmap to the basic clock types?
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/23/461
Yea I've seen that. I also used regmap myself on some earlier rev, but
it is rather an overkill solution to my purposes, and it also adds
additional latencies to the register access.
-Tero
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
