On 01/03/14 01:13, Tero Kristo wrote: > On 12/22/2013 07:39 PM, Gerhard Sittig wrote: >> >> >> Further I'd suggest to split this register access aspect out of >> the TI clock series, and to prepare it already for regmap style >> access to the hardware registers. See the next comment below. > > This sounds like a good idea to me, seeing it is blocking lots of > other things. This ll_ops struct looks like a simplified regmap. Have you seen my series that adds regmap support to the common clock framework[1]? Is there any reason why you can't use those patches and layer some patches on top to add support for regmap to the basic clock types? [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/23/461 -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
