Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> writes: > On 11/19/2013 11:18 AM, Ben Gamari wrote: >> >> I take it that the clock node work does not itself fix cpufreq? I've >> built the 3.12-dt-clks-v10-dev branch. On the bright side, it boots and >> appears to run just fine. Unfortunately, there isn't even a mention of >> cpufreq in the boot log. > > You are probably picking up a branch that is yet to be posted :)... > and I assume you know the risk of in-development patches ;) > The house hasn't burned down yet... ;) > - the branch looks to introduce purely clock nodes which patch [2] > adds on to and makes cpufreq work as a start.. > Thanks! >> >> I've seen your Google+ post[1] from May enumerating the steps to having >> working DVFS. It would be useful to post an update showing what has been >> merged, what is waiting for merge, and what is still in progress. > > We are still at "step 1 - get clock nodes" :(... and no, situation has > not improved since May 2013 when I originally posted that G+ comment > (and not because we have not been trying..). > Ouch. Good luck! >> I wasn't asking for official support, just wondering where work is >> currently happening. > > they are happening here in linux-omap mailing list.. just that the > changes are pretty fundamental and a lot of discussions have been > taking place > Thanks! Cheers, - Ben
Attachment:
pgpWGdhYP_QOR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
