On 11/19/2013 08:59 AM, Ben Gamari wrote: > > Booting a PandaBoard with a recent kernel and devicetree appears to be a > rather messy process. There are dozens of devicetree-related warnings > spewed on boot (many pertaining to missing regulators). At the moment, > however, I'm most interested in this, > > cpufreq-cpu0 cpufreq-cpu0.0: no of_node; not parsing pinctrl DT > cpu cpu0: dummy supplies not allowed > cpufreq_cpu0: failed to get cpu0 regulator: -19 > cpufreq_cpu0: failed to get cpu0 clock: -2 > cpufreq-cpu0: probe of cpufreq-cpu0.0 failed with error -2 > > What is the status of cpufreq on the PandaBoard? Is this expected to > work? > > More generally, if one wants a fairly recent kernel supporting the > PandaBoard's hardware what kernel tree should be used? Is mainline not > yet appropriate? Is linux-next preferred? Perhaps a ti-maintained tree? for upstream: Wait for the clock nodes to get merged.. we are at v9 of discussion thread here[1]. for ti-maintained tree, you need to talk to TI support folks for appropriate kernel for your product line. [1] http://marc.info/?t=138271672500002&r=1&w=2 -- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
