Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 10:44 +0200, Högander Jouni wrote: >> Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 09:37 +0200, Högander Jouni wrote: >> >> "ext Tomi Valkeinen" <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 02:24 -0700, ext Paul Walmsley wrote: >> >> >> Hi Tomi, >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 16:51 -0700, ext Paul Walmsley wrote: >> >> >> > > Hi Tomi, >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > nice test case. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Tomi.Valkeinen@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > > I have had strange clk_enable() crashes with DSS2, and now I managed to >> >> >> > > > isolate it. With the included patch, on OMAP3 SDP board, with default >> >> >> > > > kernel config, I always get the crash below. In this example case it >> >> >> > > > happens at specific time on boot, but with DSS2 it happens randomly at >> >> >> > > > runtime, when I enable the DSS clocks. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> At this point my guess would be that it is a DSS driver problem, but I >> >> >> don't think it is clear yet. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > I don't know much about power and clock domains, but I believe I found >> >> > the reason and fix for this. At least this should point to the right >> >> > direction. >> >> > >> >> > It looks to me that when I do clk_enable() to a clock which is inside a >> >> > turned off powerdomain, clk_enable() function will return before the >> >> > powerdomain is fully turned on. Reading PM_PWSTST_DSS shows that the >> >> > powerdomain is still in transition state. >> >> > >> >> > The following change waits until the powerdomain has finished the >> >> > transition. At least it fixed the problem for me, and other things seem >> >> > to be still working =). >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c >> >> > index fa62f14..f713d0b 100644 >> >> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c >> >> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c >> >> > @@ -567,6 +567,8 @@ int omap2_clkdm_clk_enable(struct clockdomain *clkdm, struct clk *clk) >> >> > else >> >> > omap2_clkdm_wakeup(clkdm); >> >> > >> >> > + pwrdm_wait_transition(clkdm->pwrdm.ptr); >> >> > + >> >> >> >> Altough this patch is fixing the problem, I'll guess it's because of >> >> delay it causes rather than waiting for >> >> PM_PWSTST_DSS. omap2_clkdm_clk_enable alone doesn't switch pwrdm to >> >> on. This is because clockdomain/powerdomains are controlled by HW (hw >> >> supervised). >> >> >> >> I think the right answer is to use ST_*_IDLE & ST_*_STDBY bits in >> >> omap2_clk_wait_ready. >> > >> > But ST_DSS_IDLE says active only after both interface and functional >> > clock are on, so it doesn't help here. >> >> Yes and in ST_DSS_IDLE description it is saying that if it's "0x1 >> Display sub-system is in idle mode and cannot be accessed". So it only >> way to get it out of idle is to enable both clocks it needs to be done. >> >> If you look at arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c:omap2_clk_wait_ready it is >> actually checking that both clocks are enabled. > > But the ST_DSS_IDLE doesn't help here. The kernel crashes after enabling > dss_ick, before your code can even enable dss_fck. The same happens if > you do it other way around, first dss_fck and then dss_ick. > >> > Why is it wrong to wait for PM_PWSTST_DSS? Do you mean that this crash >> > is not caused by the DSS being not powered on, but by something else, >> > and so the small delay just accidentally fixes the problem? >> >> Something like that. >> >> If you look at your code: >> >> +static int __init omapfb_init(void) >> +{ >> + struct clk *c1, *c2, *c3; >> + >> + c1 = clk_get(NULL, "dss_ick"); >> + c2 = clk_get(NULL, "dss1_alwon_fck"); >> + c3 = clk_get(NULL, "dss_tv_fck"); >> + >> + base = ioremap(DISPC_BASE, SZ_1K); >> + printk("mapped to %p\n", base); >> + >> + clk_enable(c1); >> >> At this point ST_DSS_IDLE should not be yet checked (because fck is >> not enabled yet. >> >> + clk_enable(c2); >> >> But at this point (actually inside clk_enable and >> omap2_clk_wait_ready) ST_DSS_IDLE should be checked before those >> register accesses in next two lines. You can verify my comment by >> adding "while(ST_DSS_IDLE);" here. > > Doesn't omap2_clk_wait_ready alread check this? Yes, you are right this is already done. > > And again, the problem is not accessing DSS registers. The problem is > that clk_enable(dss_ick) crashes. so the following code crashes also: > > static int __init test_init(void) > { > struct clk *c1 = clk_get(NULL, "dss_ick"); > > while(1) { > clk_enable(c1); > clk_disable(c1); > } > > return 0; > } > Are you still using SDP and default config + latest linux-omap? I'm not able to reproduce this using your example code. > >> >> + >> + dispc_write_reg(DISPC_IRQENABLE, 0); >> + dispc_write_reg(DISPC_IRQSTATUS, 0); >> + >> + clk_disable(c1); >> + clk_disable(c2); >> + >> + printk("usecounts %d, %d, %d\n", clk_get_usecount(c1), >> + clk_get_usecount(c2), >> + clk_get_usecount(c3)); >> + >> + /*clk_enable(c2);*/ >> + /*clk_enable(c3);*/ >> + >> + while(1) { >> + clk_enable(c1); >> + clk_disable(c1); >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +module_init(omapfb_init); >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); >> > Tomi >> > >> > >> > -- Jouni Högander -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html