* Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> [081111 23:54]: > On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:28:13 -0800 > "ext David Brownell" <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Do you see are there any issue to change label into last column like > > > in /proc/interrupts so that width doesn't have to be fixed? > > > > Only that the amount of data to the right of that label > > is variable size too. I was following a convention that > > the standard debug dump code (gpiolib) and the gpio_chip > > specific stuff all looked pretty much the same except for > > the extras (pullups, pulldowns, drive strength, debounce, > > and so on) on the right. > > > Yep, again zero thinking from me :-) > > > I'd keep it simple and just allow for fatter labels. > > Less work all around. > > > I just sent a patch extending width to 20 bytes via LKML and you in cc > list. I looked mainline and there were many labels more than 12 but > less 20 bytes. One longer was "board a9m9750dev extirq2" but looks like > it can be squeezed. Jarkko, any news on updating this patch series? It would be nice to have this queued up for 2.6.29. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
