* David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> [081119 09:34]: > On Wednesday 19 November 2008, Eero Nurkkala wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 11:16 -0800, ext David Brownell wrote: > > > > But if the issue is that the 2430 version of the FIFO > > > support works differently, please say so in the patch > > > commend and code... > > > > I checked against 2420, and there was no such register > > avaiable at all. (no 2430 TRM access) > > That code path couldn't be triggered on 2420; just 2430, > which has the FIFO (as evidently needed for highspeed I2C). > > My default assumption would be that 2430 works just like > OMAP3 here, but obviously someone should check the 2430 > TRM to see its I2C BUFSTAT_REG really works differently. Yes, they seem to be the same for 2430 and 34xx. Eero, can you please update it to use the dev->rev instead? I just pushed Paul's earlier patches for the dev->rev. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
