On Thursday 13 November 2008, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > I hadn't gotten any test results other than knowing Felipe was > > > using this. So I'll hold off a bit on sending the updated > > > patch to Samuel, probably till end-of-week, on the grounds that > > > the keypad, battery, and ADC devices didn't get tested yet. > > > > The new add_child() works quite ok and simplifies a lot the code. But > > the regulator driver, I think we can hold a bit as that needs careful > > testing. > > That's to make USB use the twl regulator code, right? Looks for now like twl4030_usb might be the first thing that's able to use the regulator code "in all its glory". Felipe can gain the glory of being the Official First Guinea Pig. ;) No rush on that, IMO. Next two obvious candidates to use "struct regulator" are the HSMMC support, and the LCD/touchscreen power domains on some of the SDPs. I think providing the board-specific init data for anything else is likely to be a big PITA, since it presumes the actual device node is known when the regulator device is created. That's not always going to be practical. - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
