* Rick Bronson <rick@xxxxxxx> [081023 11:13]: > Tony, > > > Well we should let the generic irq handler to do the logging.. But I > > guess nothing will happen if adm_do_IRQ() does not get called. > > > > We could have a dummy handler for some invented higher number that would > > capture the spurious interrupts I guess. > > > > BTW, ideally we would do the ldr conditionally rather than every time, > > I guess that's the idea with the old way of doing things. > > Well, actually the ldr (I assume you mean this one): > > ldrne \irqnr, [\base, #INTCPS_SIR_IRQ_OFFSET] > > was being done everytime, since presumably, at least one of the > "pending" bits would be set otherwise how would we get to this > interrupt? Which bring up a point - why bother even checking the > pending bits at all? Just grab the irqnr, check for spurious and > exit. Yeah that would be nice. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
