> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:42:49 +0400 Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi. > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 05:50:02AM -0700, Andrew Morton (akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > I think it's reasonable to permit the driver's operations to be interrupted > > in this manner. It's done in quite a few other places. But the problem is > > actually *testing* it. > > Why not just skipping the waiting and returning error pretending user > really sent a signal? Better than nothing, but because signal_pending() isn't actually true, upper layers wil behave differently. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html