>Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 3:50 PM
>To: Steve Sakoman; David Brownell; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List
>Subject: RE: Git tree updated to v2.6.27, some issues remain
>
>>Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 10:58 AM
>>To: David Brownell; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List
>>Subject: Re: Git tree updated to v2.6.27, some issues remain
>>
>>On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:43 AM, David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Friday 10 October 2008, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>> Anything else not working right now?
>>>
>>> MUSB on Overo...
>>
>>Indeed. Any theories?
>
>My theory -
>
>In: drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c
> struct resource r = {
> .start = TWL4030_PWRIRQ_USB_PRES,
> .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> };
> status = platform_device_add_resources(pdev, &r, 1);
>
>where value of TWL4030_PWRIRQ_USB_PRES = 378
>
>
>In: drivers/i2c/chips/twl4030-usb.c
> status = request_irq(twl->irq ^(378)^ , twl4030_usb_irq, 0, "twl4030_usb", twl);
>fails because 378 > NR_IRQS
Theory changed. NR_IRQS is 402. so above is not the issue.
Theory 2:
When I debug on LDP board, I can see the failure happening in request_irq()
In T2-probe:
request_irq( ... )
...
if (irq_desc[irq].status & IRQ_NOREQUEST)
return -EINVAL; >>>> code returns from here !!!
...
>
>
>
>>
>>I am trying a second build with EHCI enabled to see if it still dies on boot.
>>
>>Steve
>>--
>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
>>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
