On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 09:08:26PM -0700, Emanoil Kotsev wrote: > Ok, so I've installed 2.6.26 and tested most of the hardware I use. > Except hfs everything seems to be working better than with 2.6.24 and > much better then 2.6.20 as expected. > > I'll give it a try with my server, as you say you do a lot of testing > ... and after the hole discussion, I'm understanding your point of > better now. > > My basic problem is that I'am testing a kind of solution I had in mind > time ago, but it still fails for some reason even with the patched > 2.4.24 version. I gave it up and didn't test 2.6.25 because I was > pretty buzy recently. Now I see it's hard to catch up. > > My problem is the follwing one and the question is if it will disapear > after I install 2.6.26, or is it a hardware issue. I think somehow the > drive does not behave as the others drives I use over usb. I'm using > mostly seagate, but this one is WD: > > hub 7-0:1.0: debounce: port 2: total 100ms stable 100ms status 0x100 > hub 7-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0000 evt 0000 > usb usb4: suspend_rh (auto-stop) > usb usb5: suspend_rh (auto-stop) > usb usb6: suspend_rh (auto-stop) > usb usb7: suspend_rh (auto-stop) > ub(2.3): dir r len/act 4096/0 [sense 0 00 00] retry 1 You are using the ub driver, any reason for that? If you try the usb-storage driver instead, does it work better? Worse? Different? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
