On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 07:21:53AM -0700, ext Emanoil Kotsev wrote: > Dear Felipe, I just want to tell, that while still developing kernels in the 2.6.2X series a kernel 2.6.22 can not be labeled as old. Actually, it can, as it was released quite a long time ago. > Besides it comes along with few distros as default kernel. Yes, and these distros have to heavily patch it. > A lot of people like me need some kind of a stable version that we can relay on for more than playing at home, which is the case with 2.4.X tree. > > Personally, experiments with 2.6.24 brought me into a big trouble and it took many hours to migrate back to 2.6.20, so please keep in mind that if we say something like this, there is a good reason to do so. I'd strongly suggest trying 2.6.26. Cheers, Daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
