> 2008/7/29 Felipe Balbi <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:07:51PM -0500, Woodruff, Richard wrote: >>> > How about renaming it to twl92230c before submitting upstream? As far >>> > as I can tell the name menelaus appears only in linux and makes it >>> > hard to associate with the real hardware. Does someone know why was >>> > it renamed that way? >> >>> A number does seem more understandable. Though some of these chips live under a few different numbers. >> >> it does seem more understandable, but now that it has been used for so >> long I guess it would be nasty to change right now. Almost every one >> here knows that menelaus is the companion chip for omap2 hw. Personally, >> I never recall the correct number designation for menelaus. > > Well, menelaus is a friendly name now that I know what it is but it > was difficult to find its datasheet without knowing the public name > used by the manufacturer, it seemed like a nokia's own chip. Also iirc > if you open the device you will only see the TWLxxx name on the chip. > > I see TWLxxx is now mentioned in the Kconfig so I won't insist. > > Cheers I think it'll be hard for a newbie to figure out what this menelaus is. Google won't help either, (unless one really thinks there is a connection between Linux and Greek Mythology ;) ). I second renaming the file to TWL92230. Mentioning this in Kconfig is simply not enough. My 375 million ZWD, Anand -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
