On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:07:51PM -0500, Woodruff, Richard wrote: > > How about renaming it to twl92230c before submitting upstream? As far > > as I can tell the name menelaus appears only in linux and makes it > > hard to associate with the real hardware. Does someone know why was > > it renamed that way? > A number does seem more understandable. Though some of these chips live under a few different numbers. it does seem more understandable, but now that it has been used for so long I guess it would be nasty to change right now. Almost every one here knows that menelaus is the companion chip for omap2 hw. Personally, I never recall the correct number designation for menelaus. I mean, I don't really have any problems in renaming the whole driver from menelaus to twl92230c.c but I can't help asking myself why. If everybody thinks it's a better choice, then why not ;-) -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
