* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [080609 22:11]: > Hi, > > Sorry for the delay on looking at this, it's looking pretty good in > general. Few more mostly cosmetic comments below. Here's one more comment: > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm24xx.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm24xx.c > > if (omap2_pm_debug) { > > unsigned long long tmp; > > - u32 resume_time; > > + s64 resume_time; > > + struct timespec t; > > > > - resume_time = omap2_read_32k_sync_counter(); > > + getnstimeofday(&t); > > + resume_time = timespec_to_ns(&t); > > tmp = resume_time - sleep_time; > > - tmp *= 1000000; > > - omap2_pm_dump(0, 1, tmp / 32768); > > + omap2_pm_dump(0, 1, tmp / 1000); > > } You should make all these calculations using timespec_sub(): struct timespec ts1, ts2, ts_delta; getnstimeofday(&ts1); getnstimeofday(&ts2); ts_delta = timespec_sub(&ts2, &ts1); Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html