Re: [PATCH 4/9] OMAP: Add new function to check wether there is irq pending

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"ext Tony Lindgren" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> * Högander Jouni <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx> [080519 01:05]:
>> "ext Tony Lindgren" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > * Jouni Hogander <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx> [080516 03:57]:
>> >> Add common omap2/3 function to check wether there is irq pending.
>> >> Switch to use it in omap2 pm code instead of its own.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jouni Hogander <jouni.hogander@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> ---
>> >>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c        |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> >>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm24xx.c     |   19 +++----------------
>> >>  include/asm-arm/arch-omap/irqs.h |    1 +
>> >>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>> >> 
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
>> >> index ac062ee..f1e1e2e 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
>> >> @@ -20,12 +20,13 @@
>> >>  
>> >>  /* selected INTC register offsets */
>> >>  
>> >> -#define INTC_REVISION	0x0000
>> >> -#define INTC_SYSCONFIG	0x0010
>> >> -#define INTC_SYSSTATUS	0x0014
>> >> -#define INTC_CONTROL	0x0048
>> >> -#define INTC_MIR_CLEAR0	0x0088
>> >> -#define INTC_MIR_SET0	0x008c
>> >> +#define INTC_REVISION		0x0000
>> >> +#define INTC_SYSCONFIG		0x0010
>> >> +#define INTC_SYSSTATUS		0x0014
>> >> +#define INTC_CONTROL		0x0048
>> >> +#define INTC_MIR_CLEAR0		0x0088
>> >> +#define INTC_MIR_SET0		0x008c
>> >> +#define INTC_PENDING_IRQ0	0x0098
>> >>  
>> >>  /*
>> >>   * OMAP2 has a number of different interrupt controllers, each interrupt
>> >> @@ -122,6 +123,22 @@ static void __init omap_irq_bank_init_one(struct omap_irq_bank *bank)
>> >>  	intc_bank_write_reg(1 << 0, bank, INTC_SYSCONFIG);
>> >>  }
>> >>  
>> >> +int omap_irq_pending(void)
>> >> +{
>> >> +	int i;
>> >> +
>> >> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(irq_banks); i++) {
>> >> +		struct omap_irq_bank *bank = irq_banks + i;
>> >> +		int irq;
>> >> +
>> >> +		for (irq = 0; irq < bank->nr_irqs; irq += 32)
>> >> +			if (intc_bank_read_reg(bank, INTC_PENDING_IRQ0 +
>> >> +					       ((irq >> 5) << 5)))
>> >> +				return 1;
>> >> +	}
>> >> +	return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >
>> > In this case it should be enough to know if anything is set in the
>> > bank registers, so you should be able to leave out the second for loop.
>> > At most you need to read only the four bank registers. No need to check
>> > for individual interrupts.
>> 
>> Current code is presenting each interrupt controller as a bank. I
>> think in TRM they are talking about banks in each controller. So there
>> is three banks in mpu intc 0..2. This is in arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:
>> 
>>  * OMAP2 has a number of different interrupt controllers, each interrupt
>>  * controller is identified as its own "bank". Register definitions are
>>  * fairly consistent for each bank, but not all registers are implemented
>>  * for each bank.. when in doubt, consult the TRM.
>>  */
>> 
>> So the first loop is going through controllers which is only mpu
>> intc. Second loop is going through bank registers. I'm using irq only
>> for finding out right offset for bank register. This is another
>> implementation. Which does exactly same thing:
>> 
>> int omap_irq_pending(void)
>> {
>> 	int i, j;
>> 
>> 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(irq_banks); i++) {
>> 		struct omap_irq_bank *bank = irq_banks + i;
>> 
>> 		for (j = 0; j < 3; j++)
>> 			if (intc_bank_read_reg(bank, INTC_PENDING_IRQ0 +
>> 					       0x20 * j))
>> 				return 1;
>> 	}
>> 	return 0;
>> }
>> 
>> If you think this is better I can change it. In first version I was
>> just trying to follow practices used in irq.c for finding out offsets.
>
> Hmm, AFAIK, something like below should be enough to see if any interrupts
> are pending (patch untested). See also
> include/asm-arm/arch-omap/entry-macro.S> and what pm.c was doing.

No it doesn't work. It would work if irq_banks were presenting banks
instead of controllers. See my comments below.

>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
> index ac062ee..aef28ab 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #define INTC_CONTROL	0x0048
>  #define INTC_MIR_CLEAR0	0x0088
>  #define INTC_MIR_SET0	0x008c
> +#define INTC_PENDING	0x0098
>  
>  /*
>   * OMAP2 has a number of different interrupt controllers, each interrupt
> @@ -122,6 +123,20 @@ static void __init omap_irq_bank_init_one(struct omap_irq_bank *bank)
>  	intc_bank_write_reg(1 << 0, bank, INTC_SYSCONFIG);
>  }
>  
> +int omap_irq_pending(void)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(irq_banks); i++) {

ARRAY_SIZE(irq_banks) == 1, because there is only mpu intc in
irq_banks. irq_banks contains interrupt controllers, so we need to
loop through them and loop each pending (bank) register inside these
controllers.

> +		struct omap_irq_bank *bank = irq_banks + i;
> +
> +		if (intc_bank_read_reg(bank, INTC_PENDING))
> +			return 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Your function reads only first INTC_PENDING register. There are three
of them in mpu intc.

> +
>  void __init omap_init_irq(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long nr_irqs = 0;
>

-- 
Jouni Högander

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux