On Thursday 17 April 2008, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > > Userspace should limit itself to changing policies. > > CPUFreq is good, but it does not manage non-CPU-frequency knobs very well, > and there are plenty of those on OMAP3. Similar issues are widely acknowledged. > Is there any reason why we should not allow the option of userspace OPP > selection/powerdomain control for OMAP? If people don't want to use it, > they don't have to :-) Sure, allow userspace controls. Even use debugs to prototype them. Just don't build fragile interfaces ... don't expect userspace code to do the equivalent of open heart surgery. - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
