On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Well the code they were patching is in the wakeup path. As I think Tang > said, we leave !runnable tasks on whatever cpu they ran on last, even if > that cpu is offlined, we try and fix up state when we get a wakeup. > > On wakeup, it tries to find a cpu to run on and will try a cpu of the > same node first. > > Now if that node's entirely gone away, it appears the cpu_to_node() map > will not return a valid node number. > > I think that's a change in behaviour, it didn't used to do that afaik. > Certainly this code hasn't change in a while. > If cpu_to_node() always returns a valid node id even if all cpus on the node are offline, then the cpumask_of_node() implementation, which the sched code is using, should either return an empty cpumask (if node_to_cpumask_map[nid] isn't freed) or cpu_online_mask. The change in behavior here occurred because cpu_hotplug-unmap-cpu2node-when-the-cpu-is-hotremoved.patch in -mm doesn't return a valid node id and forces it to return -1 so a kzalloc_node(..., -1) fallsback to allocate anywhere. But if you only need cpu_to_node() when waking up to find a runnable cpu for this NUMA information, then I think you can just change the kzalloc_node() in alloc_{fair,rt}_sched_group() to do kzalloc(..., cpu_online(cpu) ? cpu_to_node(cpu) : NUMA_NO_NODE). [ The changelog here is confusing because it's fixing a problem in linux-next without saying so. ] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html