On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 10:59 +0800, Tang Chen wrote: > If a cpu is offline, its nid will be set to -1, and cpu_to_node(cpu) will > return -1. As a result, cpumask_of_node(nid) will return NULL. In this case, > find_next_bit() in for_each_cpu will get a NULL pointer and cause panic. Hurm,. this is new, right? Who is changing all these semantics without auditing the tree and informing all affected people? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
