On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 17:43 -0500, Cliff Wickman wrote: > Hi again, > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 03:54:38PM -0500, Cliff Wickman wrote: > > Hi linux-numa members, > > > > numactl-2.0.4-rc3.tar.gz > > is now on ftp://oss.sgi.com/www/projects/libnuma/download/ > > > > It includes: > > - Fix numactl for a machine with sparse cpu ids (Anton Blanchard) > > - Fix makefile to remove move_pages on make clean (Andi) > > - Fix numa_node_to_cpus() (Sharyathi Nagesh) > > - Rename 'thread' to 'task' (Lee Schermerhorn) > > - Remove other trailing spaces (Cliff) > > > > and recently: > > - Man page correction/clarification for numa_node_to_cpus() (Ian Wienand) > > - Man page clarification for numactl (Mike MacCana) > > - Fix numactl --hardware for cpu-less nodes (Thomas Renninger) > > - Fix set_configured_cpus() (Jan Beulich) > > - Fix memory corrupting use of strlen (Jan Beulich) > > I found one other patch that for some reason had never been applied: > - Add a DSO destructor for memory deallocation (Neil Horman) > > It is now included in numactl-2.0.4-rc3.tar.gz. Cliff: What happened to "nodes_allowed_list" ? I'm trying to build 2.0.4-rc3 on a RHEL6b2 install and I'm seeing: cc numactl.o util.o shm.o bitops.o libnuma.so -o numactl libnuma.so: undefined reference to `nodes_allowed_list' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [numactl] Error 1 rc2 builds fine. diffing libnuma.c rc2:rc3: I see: --- ../numactl-2.0.4-rc2/libnuma.c 2010-04-08 10:08:17.000000000 -0400 +++ ./libnuma.c 2010-07-02 18:40:21.000000000 -0400 @@ -54,8 +54,6 @@ static unsigned long *node_cpu_mask_v1[NUMA_NUM_NODES]; struct bitmask **node_cpu_mask_v2; -char *nodes_allowed_list = NULL; - WEAK void numa_error(char *where); #ifdef __thread @@ -95,6 +93,19 @@ memset(&numa_no_nodes, 0, sizeof(numa_no_nodes)); } +void +numa_fini(void) +{ + if (numa_all_cpus_ptr) + numa_bitmask_free(numa_all_cpus_ptr); + if (numa_all_nodes_ptr) + numa_bitmask_free(numa_all_nodes_ptr); + if (numa_no_nodes_ptr) + numa_bitmask_free(numa_no_nodes_ptr); + if (nodes_allowed_list) + free(nodes_allowed_list); +} + /* * The following bitmask declarations, bitmask_*() routines, and associated * _setbit() and _getbit() routines are: @@ -460,12 +471,6 @@ maxprocnode = read_mask(mask, numa_all_nodes_ptr); } - if (strncmp(buffer,"Mems_allowed_list:",18) == 0) { - nodes_allowed_list = malloc(strlen(buffer)-18); - strncpy(nodes_allowed_list, buffer + 19, - strlen(buffer) - 19); - nodes_allowed_list[strlen(nodes_allowed_list)-1] = '\0'; - } } fclose(f); free(buffer); <snip> So, it looks like the nodes_allowed_list was removed while the destructor was being added to free it. Is the removal intentional? If so, the patch below allows it to build. Lee Remove free of undefined nodes_allowed_list from destructor and numa header. libnuma.c | 2 -- numa.h | 2 -- 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-) Index: numactl-2.0.4-rc3/libnuma.c =================================================================== --- numactl-2.0.4-rc3.orig/libnuma.c 2010-07-02 18:40:21.000000000 -0400 +++ numactl-2.0.4-rc3/libnuma.c 2010-07-12 16:52:49.000000000 -0400 @@ -102,8 +102,6 @@ numa_fini(void) numa_bitmask_free(numa_all_nodes_ptr); if (numa_no_nodes_ptr) numa_bitmask_free(numa_no_nodes_ptr); - if (nodes_allowed_list) - free(nodes_allowed_list); } /* Index: numactl-2.0.4-rc3/numa.h =================================================================== --- numactl-2.0.4-rc3.orig/numa.h 2010-07-02 18:40:21.000000000 -0400 +++ numactl-2.0.4-rc3/numa.h 2010-07-12 16:52:38.000000000 -0400 @@ -161,8 +161,6 @@ extern struct bitmask *numa_no_nodes_ptr /* Source compatibility */ extern nodemask_t numa_no_nodes; -extern char *nodes_allowed_list; - /* Only run and allocate memory from a specific set of nodes. */ void numa_bind(struct bitmask *nodes); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
