On Wed, 12 May 2010 15:11:43 EDT, Lee Schermerhorn said: > On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 11:49 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I have a note here that this patch "breaks slab.c". But I don't recall what > > the problem was and I don't see a fix against this patch in your recently-sent > > fixup series? > > Is that Valdis Kletnieks' issue? That was an i386 build. Happened > because the earlier patches didn't properly default numa_mem_id() to > numa_node_id() for the i386 build. The rework to those patches has > fixed that. I have successfully built mmotm with the rework patches > for i386+!NUMA. Valdis tested the series and confirmed that it fixed > the problem. I thought the problem was common to both i386 and X86_64 non-NUMA (which is where I hit the problem). In any case, builds OK for me now.
Attachment:
pgpxpwRcUPSbA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
