Andi, On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Yes, I paused for a moment over this. However, I don't want to make >>> separate man pages for every sizable /proc entry. Or at least I don't >> >> numa_maps(5) already exists. You're actually removing it, not creating it. > > Yes, that's true. What I'm meaning is that in the context of > man-pages, I don't want to create a multitude of separate man-pages, > one for each /proc file (greater than a certain size). As an interim > measure, I suppose that I could create a man link (.so) file that > links the nsame numa_maps.5 to proc.5, so that if someone types "man > numa_maps" they'll at least land on the page (proc(5)) that explains > numa_maps(?). > > As I said, I think the ideal solution would probably be a numa(7) page > that includes information on numa_maps in addition to other overview > details on NUMA. One day... Okay -- today. I'm writing a short numa(7) page, which I'll send out for review later. It incoporates the numa_maps(5) material, and I'll create a numa_maps.5 link file that points at numa.7. Sound okay? Cheers, Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
