Sharyathi Nagesh wrote:
> Andi,Cliff
> Thanks for your in puts
> Excuse me for the late response, I was on leave didn't see the reply
>
> As you suggested I was thinking we can suggest distros to take the
> latest version of numactl ie version 2.
Cliff might disagree, but in my mind 2.x is still a kind of beta
version and might need some more testing before it should
be pushed out to distros.
> I tried that option, #define _GNU_SOURCE, but it was not working, hence
> I provided this hack.
#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
>>> +#define BITS_PER_BYTE 8
>>> +int get_max_cpu(void)
>>> +{
>>> + int max = 0;
>>> + int index;
>>> + cpu_set_t mask;
>>> + if( numa_sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &mask) < 0 ){
>>> + perror("numa_sched_getaffinity:");
>>
>> Ah noticed another problem. Please don't rely on the glibc cpuset_t,
>> there's no guarantee it's big enough.
>
> Instead should I use a buffer with 2048 bits ?
>
> Please let me know your thoughts, accordingly I can modify the patch
Use the existing code for this.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
