Re: [PATCH] Add unconditional exit to allocate again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Jackson wrote:
> Andi wrote:
>> It used  to be this way, but all the callers don't check for NULL currently
>> and they would crash a few instructions later.
> 
> Let them crash ;)  Some system administrator will be one step closer to
> understanding the problem if the big application running on the system
> they manage dumps core in the caller off a NULL pointer, than if some
> big application quietly, politely exits.

On a 64bit system where you don't run out of virtual address space
this typically only happens under severe OOM when core dumps won't
work either.

Besides it's not quietly.

-Andi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Devices]

  Powered by Linux