Re: [PATCH] nilfs2: Use div64_ul() instead of do_div()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 6:15 AM Thorsten Blum wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 29, 2024, at 21:40, Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On Feb 29, 2024, at 20:41, Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Feb 29, 2024, at 19:45, Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> All of the fixes in this patch seem to be correct, but this doesn't
> >>> cover nilfs_resize_fs(), nilfs_max_segment_count(), and
> >>> nilfs_sb2_bad_offset(), which also have do_div() that doesn't use the
> >>> return value.
> >>
> >> For nilfs_sb2_bad_offset(), where the dividend is u64 and the divisor is u32, we
> >> would need a dedicated function like div64_u32() that doesn't calculate the
> >> remainder, which doesn't seem to exist. What do you think?
> >
> > Never mind, there is div_u64(u64, u32). I'll submit a v2 shortly.
>
> I left nilfs_sb2_bad_offset() unchanged in v2 because div_u64() still calculates
> the remainder.
>
> Thorsten

I got it.

I reviewed and tested the v2 patch and it was fine, so I sent it to
the -mm tree.

Thanks,
Ryusuke Konishi





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux CIFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux