On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 12:25 PM Dongliang Mu wrote: > > Dongliang (or Jiacheng?), would it be possible for you to post a revised patch > > against inode_init_always() that moves the call of security_inode_alloc() > > instead of i_private initialization (as Al Viro said in a nearby thread [1]) ? > > If you have time, I would like to leave it to you since you wrote the > > original patch for inode_init_always(). > > Sure, I will post a v2 patch that moves security_inode_alloc to the > location just prior to > this_cpu_inc(nr_inodes); > with proper commit message. > I saw you already sent the v2 patch on linux-fsdevel, etc. Just thank you for your quick follow. Regards, Ryusuke Konishi > > > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAO4S-mficMz1mQW06EuCF+o11+mRDiCpufqVfoHkcRbQbs8kVw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Thanks, > > Ryusuke Konishi
