Hi,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 2:30 AM Ryusuke Konishi
<konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Jiapeng,
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 7:37 PM Jiapeng Chong
> <jiapeng.chong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Clean up the following smatch warning:
> >
> > fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c:358 nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio() warn: ignoring
> > unreachable code.
> >
> > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c b/fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c
> > index 9e5dd6324ea1..50d7e2e4daed 100644
> > --- a/fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c
> > +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segbuf.c
> > @@ -341,7 +341,6 @@ static int nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio(struct nilfs_segment_buffer *segbuf,
> > int mode_flags)
> > {
> > struct bio *bio = wi->bio;
> > - int err;
> >
> > bio->bi_end_io = nilfs_end_bio_write;
> > bio->bi_private = segbuf;
> > @@ -354,9 +353,6 @@ static int nilfs_segbuf_submit_bio(struct nilfs_segment_buffer *segbuf,
> > wi->nr_vecs = min(wi->max_pages, wi->rest_blocks);
> > wi->start = wi->end;
> > return 0;
> > -
> > - wi->bio = NULL;
> > - return err;
> > }
>
> Sorry for my late reply.
>
> I will send this to Andrew to report and fix the regression on the -mm
> patch series.
>
> I'd like to change the patch title to something like "nilfs2: Remove
> redundant code"
> since the "mm/fs" prefix does not properly represent what it applies to.
> (this patch may be folded into the patch that is causing the warning)
>
> Regards,
> Ryusuke Konishi
Sorry again.
The reported issue was already corrected in NeilBrown's revised patch set, so I
will suspend this.
Thanks,
Ryusuke Konishi
