On 2014-01-19 06:43, Ryusuke Konishi wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 00:08:58 +0100, Andreas Rohner wrote: >> On 2014-01-19 00:08, Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote: >>> I think that it is very desirable to share patches for the review on early >>> stages because it is possible to achieve a valuable results by means of >>> open and continuos discussion. So, you are welcome to share your >>> vision and your patches. >> >> Good I will prepare my patches. > > Before submitting patches, please test them with scripts/checkpatch.pl > in the latest nilfs-utils.git. This would help to reduce coding style > issues, and we will be able to concentrate on design and > implementation of the patches. I used scripts/checkpatch.pl and I hope everything is correct now. > If your patchset affects compatibility of existing code, it would be > helpful if you clarify them in terms of disk format compatibility, > ioctl interface compatibility, library compatibility, and > CUI-compatibility. Yes there are some compatibility issues with the implementation of a counter for segment usage tracking. > I expect that your work makes progress on the GC issue adding improved > algorithm (cost-benefit altogorithm, greedy algorithm, and further) to > cleanerd. Yes that's right. Although the patch set I submitted today has nothing to do with cost-benefit and greedy. I decided to first try and submit a smaller contribution with no compatibility issues. Best regards, Andreas Rohner -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
