> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-nilfs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-nilfs- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Clemens Eisserer > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 10:42 AM > To: linux-nilfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [PossibleSpam] Re: Does nilfs2 do any in-place writes? > > Hi Mark, > > > I am wondering what the impact of in-place writes of the > > superblock has on SSDs in terms of wear? > > Typically SSDs have far more advanved static wear leveling algorithms > which keep the erease count for each erease block as well as a > sophisticated mapping table. Otherwise e.g. journaling file systems > would probably kill it quickly. > > Regards, Clemens > -- Hi Clemens, Thank you for the info. That was my prior understanding; however I thought it curious that the SSD failure sited nilfs trying to access the superblock which had failed at the media level. It was a fairly high end SSD with TRIM, etc (Corsair Force 240GB). Working with the vendor to analyze further.. Thanks again, Mark T. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
