On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:18:08AM +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 22:08 +0200, Piotr Szymaniak wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 06:55:59PM +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > > > > > > So, it is clear that #359 segment is empty. Moreover, #357 segment doesn't contain ifile block with blkoff = 2 as I can see from dumpseg output. Currently, I know that #358 segment contains empty ifile block with blkoff = 2. It needs to find segment which contains not empty block of ifile for blkoff = 2. Could you share dumpseg output of all previous segments (for #358)? > > > > dumpseg of blocks 340 → 357 attached (I hope, the file is ~200KB). > > > > As I can see, checkpoints #1843 and #1819 contain ifile's block with blkoff = 2. > > Could you check state of blocks 719300 and 698817? If any of these blocks are not empty then, please, send the raw dump of non-empty block(s). Both dumps attached. Piotr Szymaniak. -- Smiejmy sie! Kto wie czy swiat potrwa jeszcze trzy tygodnie? -- Beaumarchais Pierre Augustin
Attachment:
dump.698817.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
Attachment:
dump.719300.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
